Pediatric Extrapolation Approach for U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval of Brexpiprazole in Patients Aged 13 to 17 Years with Schizophrenia.

A pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging approach was successfully employed to support the dosing regimen and approval of brexpiprazole in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia. Brexpiprazole was approved in 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia and the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder in adults based on efficacy and safety data from clinical trials. On January 13, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a general advice letter to sponsors highlighting the acceptance of efficacy extrapolation of certain atypical antipsychotics from adult patients to pediatric patients considering the similarity in disease and exposure-response relationships. Brexpiprazole is the first atypical antipsychotic approved in pediatrics using this approach. The PK data available from pediatric patients aged 13-17 years have shown high variability due to the limited number of PK evaluable subjects, which limits a robust estimation of differences between adult and pediatric patients. The PK model-based approach was thus utilized to evaluate the appropriateness of the dosing regimen by comparing PK exposures in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with exposures achieved in adults at the approved doses. In addition to exposure matching, safety data from a long-term open-label clinical study in pediatric patients informed the safety profile in pediatric patients. This report illustrates the potential of leveraging previously collected efficacy, safety, and PK data in adult patients to make a regulatory decision in pediatric patients for the indication of schizophrenia.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Isavuconazonium Sulfate.

A Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based biowaiver monograph is presented for isavuconazonium sulfate. A BCS-based biowaiver is a regulatory option to substitute appropriate in vitro data for in vivo bioequivalence studies. Isavuconazonium sulfate is the prodrug of isavuconazole, a broad-spectrum azole antifungal indicated for invasive fungal infections. While the prodrug can be classified as a BCS Class III drug with high solubility but low permeability, the parent drug can be classified as a BCS Class II drug with low solubility but high permeability. Interestingly, the in vivo behavior of both is additive and leads isavuconazonium sulfate to act like a BCS class I drug substance after oral administration. In this work, experimental solubility and dissolution data were evaluated and compared with available literature data to investigate whether it is feasible to approve immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing isavuconazonium sulfate according to official guidance from the FDA, EMA and/or ICH. The risks associated with waiving a prodrug according to the BCS-based biowaiver guidelines are reviewed and discussed, noting that current regulations are quite restrictive on this point. Further, results show high solubility but instability of isavuconazonium sulfate in aqueous media. Although experiments on the dissolution of the capsule contents confirmed 'very rapid' dissolution of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) isavuconazonium sulfate, its release from the commercial marketed capsule formulation Cresemba is limited by the choice of capsule shell material, providing an additional impediment to approval of generic versions via the BCS-Biowaiver approach.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride.

Levocetirizine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, is prescribed to treat uncomplicated skin rashes associated with chronic idiopathic urticaria as well as the symptoms of both seasonal and continual allergic rhinitis. In this monograph, the practicality of using Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based methodologies as a substitute for pharmacokinetic studies in human volunteers to appraise the bioequivalence of immediate-release (IR) oral, solid dosage forms containing levocetirizine dihydrochloride was investigated, using data from the literature and in-house testing. Levocetirizine's solubility and permeability properties, as well as its dissolution from commercial products, its therapeutic uses, therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic traits, were reviewed in accordance with the BCS, along with any reports in the literature about failure to meet bioequivalence (BE) requirements, bioavailability issues, drug-excipient interactions as well as other relevant information. The data presented in this monograph unequivocally point to classification of levocetirizine in BCS Class 1. For products that are somewhat supra-equivalent or somewhat sub-equivalent, clinical risks are expected to be insignificant in light of levocetirizine's wide therapeutic index and unlikelihood of severe adverse effects. After careful consideration of all the information available, it was concluded that the BCS-based biowaiver can be implemented for products which contain levocetirizine dihydrochloride, provided (a) the test product comprises excipients that are typically found in IR oral, solid drug products that have been approved by a country belonging to or associated with ICH and are used in quantities that are typical for such products, (b) data supporting the BCS-based biowaiver are gathered using ICH-recommended methods, and (c) all in vitro dissolution requirements specified in the ICH guidance are met by both the test and comparator products (in this case, the comparator is the innovator product).

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Dosage Forms: Levamisole Hydrochloride.

This work describes the potential applicability of the BCS-based Biowaiver to oral solid dosage forms containing Levamisole hydrochloride, an anthelmintic drug on the WHO List of Essential Medicines. Solubility and permeability data of levamisole hydrochloride were searched in the literature and/or measured experimentally. Levamisole hydrochloride is a highly soluble drug, but there is no clear evidence of high permeability in humans, indicating that it should provisionally be assigned to BCS class III. The biowaiver procedure would thus be applicable for solid oral dosage forms containing levamisole hydrochloride as the only active ingredient. Due to the lack of data in the literature regarding excipient effects on the bioequivalence of products containing levamisole, it is currently recommended that the products comply with the ICH and WHO guidelines: the test formulation should have the same qualitative composition as the comparator, contain very similar quantities of those excipients, and be very rapidly dissolving at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8. However, for certain well-studied excipients, there appears to be opportunity for additional regulatory relief in future versions of the ICH BCS Guidance M9, such as not requiring that the quantities of these common excipients in the test and comparator be the same.

Extrapolation of Efficacy from Adults to Pediatric Patients of Drugs for Treatment of Partial Onset Seizures: A Regulatory Perspective.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has concluded that the efficacy of drugs approved for the treatment of partial onset seizures (POS) in adults can be extrapolated to pediatric patients 1 month of age and above and that independent efficacy trials in this pediatric population are no longer needed. This paper focuses on the dosing, pharmacokinetic (PK), exposure-response, and clinical information that were leveraged from the approved drugs for the treatment of POS to conduct analyses that supported extrapolation of efficacy in pediatric patients. Clinical data from trials for eight drugs (levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, perampanel, tiagabine, and vigabatrin) approved in both adults and pediatric patients for the treatment of POS were analyzed. Comparisons of exposures at approved doses, placebo response, and model-based exposure-response relationships were performed. Based on disease similarity, similar response to intervention, and similar exposure-response relationships in adults and pediatric patients, it was concluded that extrapolation of efficacy in pediatric patients aged 1 month and above is acceptable. PK analysis to determine pediatric dose and regimens that provide drug exposure similar to that known to be effective in adult patients with POS will be required, along with long-term open-label safety data in pediatric patients.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Sitagliptin Phosphate Monohydrate.

Sitagliptin is an antihyperglycemic drug used in adults for the treatment of diabetes Type 2. Literature data and in-house experiments were applied in this monograph to assess whether methods based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) could be used to assess the bioequivalence of solid immediate-release (IR) oral dosage forms containing sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, as an alternative to a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers. The solubility and permeability characteristics of sitagliptin were reviewed according to the BCS, along with dissolution, therapeutic index, therapeutic applications, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic characteristics, reports of bioequivalence (BE) / bioavailability problems, data on interactions between the drug and excipients and other data germane to the subject. All data reviewed in this monograph unambiguously support classification of sitagliptin as a BCS Class 1 drug. In light of its broad therapeutic index and lack of severe adverse effects, the clinical risks associated with moderately supraoptimal doses were deemed inconsequential, as were the risks associated with moderately suboptimal doses. Taking all evidence into consideration, it was concluded that the BCS-based biowaiver can be implemented for solid IR oral drug products containing sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, provided (a) the test product is formulated solely with excipients commonly present in solid IR oral drug products approved in ICH or associated countries and used in amounts commonly applied in this type of product, (b) data in support of the BCS-based biowaiver are obtained using the methods recommended by the WHO, FDA, EMA or ICH and (c) the test product and the comparator product (which is the innovator product in this case) meet all in vitro dissolution specifications provided in the WHO, FDA, EMA or ICH guidance.

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development for Rare Diseases in Neurology: Contributions and Opportunities.

Several challenges are associated with rare disease drug development in neurology. In this article, we summarize the US Food and Drug Administration's experience with clinical drug development for rare neurological diseases and discuss clinical pharmacology's critical contributions to drug development for rare diseases. We used publicly available information to identify and screen drug products approved for rare neurological indications between 1983 and 2019. We highlighted cases in which clinical pharmacology contributed to the evidence of drug efficacy, dose selection for pivotal clinical trials, dose optimization based on intrinsic and extrinsic factors, pharmacokinetic bridging for formulations, and efficacy bridging across different racial groups. Fifty-one approved drug products were identified since the introduction of the Orphan Drug Act in 1983. Interestingly, the number of approvals in the last few years increased significantly, probably due to advances in genomic research and targeted drug modalities. Evaluation of dose selection in patient populations showed that in 52% of cases, the sponsors did not evaluate efficacy for more than one or two dose levels throughout the development program. Clinical pharmacology studies to evaluate the effect of intrinsic or extrinsic factors were adequately characterized in most of the applications. With the expansion of model informed drug development applications, (e.g., quantitative systems pharmacology and deep learning neural network models), the role and impact of clinical pharmacology is expected to grow exponentially in the next decade and enhance the development of novel treatment modalities for neurological rare diseases.

Impact of age-related macular degeneration on diabetic retinopathy: An electronic health record based big data analysis from a tertiary eye centre in South India.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) decreases the risk of diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-cohort study performed in patients with a systemic diagnosis of diabetes at a tertiary health care center from May 2011 to April 2020. A total of 43,153 patients (1,024 AMD patients and 42,129 non-AMD patients) were included in the analysis. A total of 1,024 age and diabetes mellitus (DM) duration-matched controls were chosen from the non-AMD group for risk factor analysis. The severity of diabetic retinopathy was compared between the patients with AMD and the patients without AMD. RESULTS: Out of the enrolled 43,153 diabetic patients, 26,906 were males and 16,247 were females. A total of 1,024 patients had AMD and 42,129 had no AMD. The mean age of the cohort was 58.60 ± 0.09 years. The overall prevalence of DR was noted to be 22.8% (9,825 out of 43,153 eyes). A significantly lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) (23% in non-AMD, 11.4% in AMD, OR = -0.43, P < 0.001), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (12% in non-AMD, 8.2% in AMD, OR = -0.66, P < 0.001), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (11% in non-AMD, 3.2% in AMD, OR = -0.27, P < 0.001) was seen in the AMD patients. No significant difference was seen between the dry and wet AMD. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the lower age, absence of AMD, and male gender were associated with a higher risk of PDR. CONCLUSION: The presence of AMD was noted to statistically reduce the risk of DR. Our results may be useful in the field of resource allocation and awareness of DR.

Extrapolation of Efficacy and Dose Selection in Pediatrics: A Case Example of Atypical Antipsychotics in Adolescents With Schizophrenia and Bipolar I Disorder.

Pediatric labeling information for novel atypical antipsychotics can be significantly delayed as the result of time lag between initial drug approval in adults and the completion of pediatric clinical trials. This delay can lead health care providers to rely on limited evidence-based literature to make critical therapeutic decisions for pediatric patients. Effective and scientifically justified dosing recommendations are needed to improve treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Extrapolation-based drug development strategies rely on leveraging prior data to reduce evidentiary requirements for newer data in establishing drug efficacy. On January 13, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a general advice letter to sponsors highlighting the acceptance of extrapolating efficacy of atypical antipsychotics to pediatric patients. This review provides insight into the FDA's justification for extrapolating efficacy from adult to pediatric patients and provides a rationale for dose selection in pediatric patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Carbamazepine.

Literature relevant to assessing whether BCS-based biowaivers can be applied to immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing carbamazepine as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient are reviewed. Carbamazepine, which is used for the prophylactic therapy of epilepsy, is a non-ionizable drug that cannot be considered "highly soluble" across the range of pH values usually encountered in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, evidence in the open literature suggests that carbamazepine is a BCS Class 2 drug. Nevertheless, the oral absolute bioavailability of carbamazepine lies between 70 and 78% and both in vivo and in vitro data support the classification of carbamazepine as a highly permeable drug. Since the therapeutic and toxic plasma level ranges overlap, carbamazepine is considered to have a narrow therapeutic index. For these reasons, a BCS based biowaiver for IR tablets of carbamazepine cannot be recommended. Interestingly, in nine out of ten studies, USP dissolution conditions (900 mL water with 1% SLS, paddle, 75 rpm) appropriately discriminated among bioinequivalent products and this may be a way forward to predicting whether a given formulation will be bioequivalent to the comparator product.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Metformin Hydrochloride.

Data are examined regarding possible waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing (i.e. biowaiver) for approval of metformin hydrochloride (metformin) immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. Data include metformin's Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) properties, including potential excipient interactions. Metformin is a prototypical transporter-mediated drug and is highly soluble, but only 50% of an orally administered dose is absorbed from the gut. Therefore, metformin is a BCS Class III substance. A BCS-based approval approach for major changes to marketed products and new generics is admissible if test and reference dosage forms have the identical active pharmaceutical ingredient and if in vitro dissolution from both are very rapid (i.e. at least 85% within 15 min at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8). Recent International Council for Harmonisation BCS guidance indicates all excipients for Class III biowaivers are recommended to be qualitatively the same and quantitatively similar (except for preservatives, flavor agents, colorant, or capsule shell or film coating excipients). However, despite metformin being a prototypical transporter-mediated drug, there is no evidence that commonly used excipients impact metformin absorption, such that this restriction on excipients for BCS III drugs merits regulatory relief. Commonly used excipients in usual amounts are not likely to impact metformin absorption.

Shortened Positive and Negative Symptom Scale as an Alternate Clinical Endpoint for Acute Schizophrenia Trials: Analysis from the US Food & Drug Administration.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the individual Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) items, and to assess the feasibility of using a shortened version of the PANSS as an alternative regulatory endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of drugs to treat schizophrenia. Design: Data from 32 randomized, placebo-controlled, multiregional trials from eight atypical antipsychotic programs (N=14,219) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration were used in the analyses. Item response theory analysis on baseline PANSS item scores was used to identify the best performing items of the PANSS to derive the shortened, or modified, PANSS (mPANSS). Concordance rates of mPANSS total with the PANSS total trial results at week 6 were examined, and implications of using mPANSS on trial sample size evaluated. Results: Five of the positive items, six of the negative items, and eight of the general items were assessed as sensitive to describe the underlying symptom severity and comprise mPANSS. The overall concordance rate between mPANSS and total PANSS results at week 6 was 97.6%. Using mPANSS resulted in a 32% reduction in samples size relative to using total PANSS. Conclusions: Based on this research, mPANSS may be considered a potential alternative clinical endpoint for acute schizophrenia trials. However, it will need psychometric validation before it can be fully implemented in clinical trials in place of total PANSS. If such implementation occurs, the development of new drugs for schizophrenia, a public health imperative, may be considerably improved.

An Innovative Pharmacometric Approach for the Simultaneous Analysis of Frequency, Duration and Severity of Migraine Events.

PURPOSE: To explore the use of a multistate repeated, time-to-categorical event model describing the frequency, severity and duration of migraines. METHODS: Subject level data from patients in placebo arms from two efficacy trials for migraine-preventive treatments were used. Models were developed using NONMEM 7.3. A survival model was combined with an ordered categorical model to form the repeated-time-to-start of categorical migraine event model, which simultaneously described the time-to-start of migraines and the severity of the starting migraine event. This was linked to a repeated-time-to-end of migraine event model with different hazard functions depending on the severity of the ongoing migraine event. Model performance was internally and externally qualified. RESULTS: The successfully qualified model showed that patients responding to placebo had a reduction in migraine incidence rate, and a decreased proportion of severe migraines. There was an increase in moderate migraine duration, an increased proportion of mild migraines and a reduction in proportion of severe migraines. Age was related to migraine duration. CONCLUSIONS: The model represents an innovative framework for clinical trial modeling and simulation, and successfully describes placebo effect in migraine prevention. This approach can be adapted to investigate exposure-response relationship of drugs and can also be implemented in other therapeutic areas where the rate, duration and severity of disease episodes are relevant to trial outcomes.

Association of End Point Definition and Randomized Clinical Trial Duration in Clinical Trials of Schizophrenia Medications.

Importance: Facilitating the development of safe and effective medications for schizophrenia is a public health imperative. Objectives: To evaluate the association of shortening randomized clinical trial (RCT) duration with the modification of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for the design of RCTs of medications for schizophrenia and to offer perspective on an alternative regulatory pathway to the historically accepted trial duration and response assessment. Data Sources: A database was created consisting of clinical trial data from 32 placebo-controlled RCTs of 8 atypical antipsychotic drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2015. The database included information on total and individual PANSS item ratings, demographic characteristics, disposition, and adverse events (AEs). Study Selection: All clinical trials submitted to 8 new drug applications of atypical antipsychotic drugs were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Quality control checks were performed to ensure that the collected data were consistent with the reported results of each trial. Data were collected from March 15, 2015, to September 30, 2015. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2015, to June 20, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The following analyses were performed: (1) longitudinal assessment of mean change from baseline in total PANSS score, (2) correlation analyses between change from baseline in total PANSS score at week 6 and earlier time points, (3) concordance analyses of outcomes across trials between week 6 and earlier time points using total PANSS and modified PANSS, and (4) analyses of time course of treatment-emergent AEs. Results: The final database contained data from 14 219 participants enrolled in 32 drug trials; 9805 of 14 219 participants (69.0%) were male and were either white (7183 [50.5%]) or black (4346 [30.6%]) individuals. The mean (SD) age during treatment was 38.9 (10.9) years, and the mean (SD) age at schizophrenia diagnosis was 25 (8.5) years. Statistically significant separation between treatment response and placebo response was observed after 1 week of treatment. The overall concordance rate across treatment groups steadily increased from week 1 to week 4 (68.0% for week 1, 74.0% for week 2, 83.0% for week 3, and 93.0% for week 4). Trends in AE occurrence were evident by week 1 and percentage of AEs were similar across weeks 3, 4, and 6. The overall concordance rate between change from baseline in the modified PANSS score and change from baseline in the total PANSS score was 93.0% (80 of 86 treatment groups) at week 4 and 97.7% (84 of 86 treatment groups) at week 6. Shortening the trial duration to 4 weeks increased the required sample size to 502 participants. Using the modified PANSS as the end point, the sample size for a 4-week trial was 402 participants and 296 participants for a 6-week trial. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this analysis suggest that there is the potential to streamline the design of schizophrenia drug clinical trials. Trial sponsors may consider incorporating these strategies and are encouraged to consult with the FDA early in the drug development process.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride.

In this monograph, literature data is reviewed to evaluate the feasibility of waiving in vivo bioequivalence testing and instead applying the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based methods to the approval of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride as the sole active pharmaceutical ingredient. To facilitate the feasibility decision, solubility and permeability and dissolution characteristics in the context of the BCS, therapeutic index, therapeutic use, pharmacokinetic parameters, bioequivalence/bioavailability issues, drug-excipient interactions and other relevant data were taken into consideration. Moxifloxacin is a BCS class I drug with a wide therapeutic index. Bioequivalence risks arising from the presence of different excipients in the formulation and due to manufacturing variables were deemed to be low. The risks can be further reduced if the choice of excipients is limited to those present in products already approved in International Conference on Harmonisation or associated countries and if the results of in vitro dissolution studies comply with the specifications stipulated in the appropriate biowaiver guidelines. Under these conditions, we conclude that a BCS-based biowaiver can be recommended for moxifloxacin immediate-release solid oral dosage forms.

The global bioequivalence harmonisation initiative: Report of EUFEPS/AAPS third conference.

The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) and American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) have collaborated since 2015 to organize international conferences to support global harmonization of regulatory requirements for bioequivalence (BE) assessment. This collaboration has resulted in three Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative (GBHI) workshops which provided a unique opportunity for scientists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to discuss current, complex BE issues. The 3rd GBHI workshop was held in April 2018 in Amsterdam/The Netherlands and covered the following topics: (a) the necessity of multiple-dose studies in BE testing; (b) BE of transdermal delivery systems, and (c) liposomal parenteral preparations. This report summarizes the extensive discussions that led to better understanding of the similarities and differences across the major regulatory agencies on these topics and paved the way for future international harmonization.

Application of Clinical Pharmacology Principles in Drug Development of Modified-Release Products: Leveraging Exposure-Response Information to Support Approval.

The development of modified-release (MR) drug products aims to address a clinical need such as improving patient compliance. There are multiple pathways and development strategies for the registration and approval of MR products. The development strategy of an MR product is usually dependent on the availability and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics of the reference drug product, that is, an immediate-release (IR) product or a reference MR. Compared with a reference IR product, an MR product is likely to have a different PK profile over the least common dosing time due to unequal dosing intervals. In case of differences in PK profiles between the MR product and the reference product, confirmatory efficacy and safety studies may be needed to support registration. In some cases, however, a thorough clinical PK/PD characterization may provide sufficient basis to support the approval of the proposed MR product without the need for additional safety and efficacy studies. This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration experience and the regulatory considerations supporting the approval of MR products in the past 6 years and discusses cases in which clinical pharmacology and PK/PD information were leveraged to support approval without the need for additional clinical studies. Details of all these cases are available in the public domain. In 2 cases a well-characterized exposure-response relationship provided sufficient justification that differences in the shape of the PK profiles were not clinically relevant. In the remaining 3 cases a thorough characterization of the PK profile along with a risk-based approach provided bases for approval.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Cephalexin Monohydrate.

Literature data and results of experimental studies relevant to the decision to allow waiver of bioequivalence studies in humans for the approval of immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing cephalexin monohydrate are presented. Solubility studies were performed in accordance with the current biowaiver guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration, World Health Organization and European Medicines Agency, taking the degradation at some pH values into consideration. Together with solubility and permeability data for cephalexin monohydrate from the literature, it was demonstrated to be a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class 1 drug. The pharmacokinetic behavior, results of bioequivalence studies published in the literature, as well as the therapeutic uses, potential toxicity and potential excipient effects on bioavailability were also assessed. Cephalexin has a wide therapeutic index and no bioequivalence problems have been reported. Dissolution studies were run under Biopharmaceutics Classification System-biowaiver conditions for the pure drug and 2 generic formulations available on the German market. Considering all relevant aspects, it was concluded that a biowaiver-based approval for products containing cephalexin monohydrate as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient is scientifically justified, provided that well-established excipients are used in usual amounts and that both test and reference dosage forms meet the guideline criteria of either "rapidly dissolving" or "very rapidly dissolving."